Israel’s role in the struggle against anti-Semitism

Published in The Jerusalem Post and Israel Hayom, November 2, 2018.

Print-friendly copy

It is a big mistake on the part of some US Jews to politicize the fight against anti-Semitism. Keep partisan politics out of it! Israeli and Diaspora Jews should band together to draw strength from solidarity, jointly combat hate, and raise the flag of unafraid and vibrant Jewish life everywhere. 

Cartoon by Shlomo Cohen, Israel Hayom 29.10.18

Education and Diaspora Affairs Minister Naftali Bennett rushed to Pittsburgh this week to represent the Government of Israel at memorial events following the terrorist massacre in the “Tree of Life” synagogue. So did the Israeli Consul General in New York Dani Dayan.

Prime Minister Netanyahu and his cabinet offered every possible assistance to American Jewry. A semi-secret cabinet-level forum including Mossad representatives is scheduled to meet to discuss security for world Jewry.

Israeli solidarity with US Jews at this time of suffering is worthy and important, even if some US Jews were quick to reject the Netanyahu government’s good wishes. In today’s highly-charged political environment, they see guns laws and the rhetoric of President Trump as part of the problem, and they feel Netanyahu is too close to Trump.

I think it is a big mistake on the part of these US Jews to politicize the fight against anti-Semitism, and to willy-nilly drive the liberal-conservative divide into the fight against anti-Semitism – when healing and harmony are the much better and needed sentiment in world Jewish affairs.

It’s worth remembering and appreciating the fact that Israelis have a come a long way in learning to appreciate and value the Jewish Diaspora. And not always has the State of Israel seen the struggle against anti-Semitism around the world as its fight. This is not something to be taken for granted.

For the first 25 years of Israel’s existence, the unspoken attitude in Jerusalem was that “if Jews abroad have a problem with anti-Semites they can always migrate to Israel.” Immersed in the business of building and defending the Jewish nation-state, Israel’s leaders had no time for “troubles of the Diaspora past.”

Attitudes began to change after the Yom Kippur War. The campaign of political delegitimization against Israel launched by Arab countries led to the infamous “Zionism is Racism” resolution at the UN, and a ton of propaganda that blended anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. The Big Lie entered intellectual discourse.

After the Rue Copernic Paris synagogue bombing in 1980 and other terror attacks, Prime Minister Menachem Begin took the decision to have Israeli officials begin advising Jewish communities abroad on security measures, and response to anti-Semitism began to find its place on Israel’s agenda.

With the disintegration of the Communist bloc, an enhanced role for Israeli diplomacy regarding anti-Semitism also became more necessary and possible. Jerusalem intervened and pressed for government crackdowns on official and street manifestations of anti-Semitism in the emerging states of the former USSR.

In the late 1980s, then-Cabinet Secretary (and later Supreme Court Justice) Elyakim Rubinstein established an “Inter-Ministerial Forum for Monitoring Anti-Semitism,” and expanded it to include Diaspora Jewish representatives and academic experts. The Forum compiled reports on anti-Semitism around the world and eventually won a place on the Israeli cabinet’s agenda, reporting once a year.

The 2001 World Conference against Racism, known as Durban I, turned into one of the greatest displays of organized anti-Jewish and anti-Israel hate ever. It was horrible watershed moment that clarified how anti-Semitism had become a strategic threat. It traumatized even many Israelis.

In 2003, then-Minister for Jerusalem and Diaspora Affairs Natan Sharansky founded the Global Forum against Anti-Semitism (of which I was the coordinator), involving Jewish leaders and intellectuals. “The State of Israel has decided to take the gloves off and implement a coordinated counteroffensive against anti-Semitism,” Sharansky wrote. “The State of Israel will play, as it always should, a central role in defending the Jewish People…”

In 2016, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) adopted a working definition of anti-Semitism based on Sharansky’s work, which includes prohibitions on using double standards to single out Israel or denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination. (By this definition, it is anti-Semitic to claim that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor, to compare Israel to Nazi Germany, or to use symbols associated with classic anti-Semitism like the blood libel to characterize Israel or Israelis).

But much of the self-styled human rights community has studiously ignored the IHRA framework. Groups such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the World Council of Churches reject the definitions described above, and frequently stray into anti-Semitic territory in their incessant and fierce criticism of Israel. They also have studiously ignored the vast amounts of anti-Semitic materials emanating from the Arab world.

Today, everybody agrees that combating “cyberhate” including anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism is a top priority. Israel’s Justice Ministry even has a department dedicated to the fight against online incitement. And the Global Forum against Anti-Semitism, now under the auspices of the Israeli foreign affairs and diaspora ministries, is tackling Christian theological anti-Semitism, Holocaust revisionism, Palestinian denialism of Jewish history, campus anti-Semitism, legislative assaults on Jewish practices like ritual slaughter and circumcision, and even anti-Semitism in sports.

Some experts warn that, unless the rising tide of hate crimes in the US is turned back, American Jewry will have to undergo a process of European-style fortress-ization. Synagogues and Jewish community centers in the US may need to be protected from neo-Nazis just as synagogues and Jewish community centers in Europe are protected from radical Islamists.

This means the adding of multilayered defenses to Jewish sites, including security screening with armed guards, surveillance systems, panic rooms and sterile zones.

If this is the unfortunate fate of American Jewish institutional life – I hope not! – Israeli security expertise undoubtedly will prove helpful.

In the meantime, Israeli and Diaspora Jews should band together to draw strength from solidarity, jointly combat hate, and raise the flag of unafraid and vibrant Jewish life everywhere. Keep partisan politics out of it!

David M. Weinberg is a think tank director, columnist and lobbyist who is a sharp critic of Israel’s detractors and of post-Zionist trends in Israel. Read more »
A passionate speaker, David M. Weinberg lectures widely in Israel, the U.S. and Canada to Jewish and non-Jewish audiences. He speaks on international politics and Middle East strategic affairs, Israeli diplomacy and defense strategy, intelligence matters and more. Click here to book David Weinberg as a speaker

Accessibility Toolbar