The “Noble Prize” for Fighting Evil

Published in The Jerusalem Post on April 20, 2003

I heard a radio interview last week with Justice Minister Tommy Lapid in which he assured listeners that he regularly participates in a family Passover seder; “like all good, traditional Jewish families”, he added. In the same breath, Lapid was quick to disassociate himself from one passage of the good old traditional seder: “We *never* recite the “shfoh hamathah” section!”, he declared.


This is the prayer asking G-d to “pour out” His wrath upon the enemies who seek to destroy the Jewish People, inserted in the seder as the door is opened for the “arrival” of Elijah the prophet.


“Pour out thy wrath”, I guess, is too tough-minded for Tommy Lapid. Coming from a Holocaust survivor who ought to know a thing or two about evil and the need for its eradication, I find such sensitivity a bit strange.


Over the past two months, the world has witnessed Lapid-style liberal benevolence and kindliness writ large. It is the self-destructive, misguided tenderness that passes for “humanism” and leads intellectuals and countries to express sympathy for dictators while shunning and condemning the courageous leaders who lead the way in combating evil.


This Lapid- and Chirac- and Schroeder-styled pacifism is the smug tolerance for Saddam Hussein and his ilk that pretentiously, but falsely, calls itself a “peace movement”. It is the artsy, fashionable sentiment that condemns all war as wrong, while in fact endangering the free-thinking world and coddling the evil that deserves all the wrath, including Divine wrath, that we can muster.


“Pour out thy wrath upon our enemies” is in the Hagaddah text for a reason; to purposefully exclude and ward off the placid, falsely high-minded, thinking that has overtaken so much of today’s Western world.


The overpowering global spread of this off-beam “humanism” explains why President George W. Bush will never win the Nobel Peace Prize. Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt were never seriously considered for the Prize, either – despite the fact that by championing war against, and defeating Hitler, they did more for global peace, humanism and liberal democracy than anyone else this past century. So too Bush Jr.’s valiant, successful war against Saddam; it will hang back, alas, widowed of any liberal Peace Prize.


Instead, the Nobel Peace Prize remains the province of Jimmy Carter, Kofi Anan, Shimon Peres and Yasser Arafat. Arguably, the namby-pamby humanist thinking of Carter, Anan and Peres, not to mention the bloodthirstiness of Arafat, have brought the world more war, not peace.


Had Carter taken a more aggressive stance towards revanchist Iran and its Islamic expansionism in the early days of the revolution, it’s unlikely that today we would be facing Hezbollah and Hamas terrorist threats of the current magnitude. Had Peres held Arafat to the terms of the peace deal that Peres himself negotiated, it’s certain that Israel never would have fallen prey to so much terrorism. Had Anan led the U.N. with wisdom, it would have held Saddam’s feet to the fire of the several dozen Security Council resolutions over the past 15 years demanding WMD disarmament – and Bush’s war to disarm and liberate Iraq might not have been necessary.


Instead, the paragons of virtue sit in French cafes and Norwegian love-boats sniffing pacifism, organizing demonstrations against American and Israeli militarism, and gaily handing out more Nobels for ‘peace’. Perhaps next year they’ll make Jacques Chirac a laureate.


Wars of ideas are too important to be ignored; and make no mistake, this is an ideological war within the West of enormous significance. Therefore, I think it time for the creation of an alternative global award for the advancement of peace. Let’s call it the “Noble Prize for Fighting Evil”. Its first recipient: George W. Bush.


Down the road, the “Noble Prize for Fighting Evil” could be awarded posthumously to Menachem Begin for bombing the Osirak reactor in 1991; to Steven Emerson for exposing the dangers of Islamic fundamentalist terror long before 9/11; to British Prime Minister Tony Blair for staking (perhaps sacrificing) his political career in order to stand by Bush; even to Ariel Sharon for Operation Defensive Shield.


The “Noble Prize” committee might even consider incorporating a version of the Passover seder prayer, “Pour out thy wrath upon those who seek to destroy freedom and democracy”, into the award ceremony. Even Tommy Lapid might agree to participate.

David M. Weinberg is a think tank director, columnist and lobbyist who is a sharp critic of Israel’s detractors and of post-Zionist trends in Israel. Read more »
A passionate speaker, David M. Weinberg lectures widely in Israel, the U.S. and Canada to Jewish and non-Jewish audiences. He speaks on international politics and Middle East strategic affairs, Israeli diplomacy and defense strategy, intelligence matters and more. Click here to book David Weinberg as a speaker

Accessibility Toolbar